To My Dearest Friends,
Two days after filing a complaint about unlicensed judges to the California State Bar they posted on Google that I am not allowed to practice law. This was in retaliation for reporting two of my previous supervisors for not having active licenses for decades. Whether this was the State Bar's idea or the EEOC under John Sherlock, I will probably never know. However, note this fact: this posting is something that the State Bar NEVER DOES. It was meant to humiliate me and further their retaliatory actions against me. The EEOC is corrupt and in a vector like fashion reaches out to other organizations promising favors et al. in an effort to destroy another's livelihood. It was not enough for the EEOC to destroy me while employed by them. Years later even after I left their employment the EEOC continued to retaliate and does so to date. What are they afraid of after four years? Plenty I assure you. Truth and Justice cannot prevail when the EEOC is so powerful. It is time for Sherlock to be punished for forcing others to perjure themselves while he too violates the law, counts to numerous to mention. His acts and those of others are criminal in nature. Make no mistake their corruption exceeds all bounds of decency and civilized behavior. The question to be asked and answered is why the EEOC does not want me to have my day in court? Answer: Since 1999, my doctor and I asked for accommodations, in April of 2000, I was declared legally blind. The request for accommodations are to numerous to count, but did not happen until we were in the middle of my trial. I have all of the e-mails from Washington D.C., Office of General Counsel which state that under no circumstances should I be accommodated at any point, especially during the trial. I received outstanding performance evaluations through 2003 and no cases were overturned. I filed my case in 2003. My trial was in 2005 and lasted almost two years. The EEOC needed this time to paint me as a rogue employee, unethical, and a trouble maker. They destroyed evidence and lied through their teeth. If speaking the truth is so hard on the EEOC then my DIRECTOR should have never had office meetings where he was only concerned about the number of case closures since his Christmas bonus was tied to this number. As I stated before, I raised the issue that his question was inappropriate since it should have been "how much justice did we serve." Trust me when I relay that I did not get paid my full salary, and was one more Christmas I wrapped presents for my children that I gave them from previous years. How I wept for what I thought could make a difference in the world as so many employees were entitled to the same justice as others and as so stated in the mission statement. When will Congress have hearings about the illegal acts they perpetrate especially on their own employees. When will Congress get off their "proverbial ass" and do something? How many body bags will it take? I believe Congress knows full-well what has been happening for decades but turn a blind eye. Clarence Thomas was the Chairman for the EEOC when he defamed Anita Hill. It just goes on and on. Decades of corruption that repeat themselves over and over. I will be retaliated again in ways you won't believe. Stay tuned, I won't keep silent.
In conclusion the EEOC's appellate brief makes two arguments, the first is "That I am not dead yet," and of course the other is that I failed to exhaust my administrative remedies. How can a person exhaust their administrative remedies when Sherlock places the appeal in the wrong venue. Employees of the EEOC, especially those acting as judges, are supposed to go straight to the Commission. I knew this and filed in federal district court within sixty days. Sherlock, in even more illegal actions submitted evidence to OFO after the period for all submissions had passed. Even after Sherlock admitted evidence long after the regulations allow, i.e., my federal complaint, he still held on to it for six more months. All in hopes that I would die. Now he wants to employ more stress which he knows a person with terminal illnesses cannot tolerate. Although, I could use a few choice words to describe him, I am too much of a lady to do so.
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Elizabeth Bullock
No comments:
Post a Comment